jump to navigation

Crime Initiatives May Take Money From Education May 27, 2010

Posted by FairSentencing in : Current News , 1 comment so far

State reserve money that could have gone to education will likely go to state prisons and, according to some, support of crime initiatives is holding taxpayer money hostage.

Like every other state agency, Oregon’s Department of Corrections has been ordered by the governor to cut 9 percent of its budget, a total of $50 million.

“We have a bit of a box we’re in that is very difficult to manage,” said Max Williams, the director of the Department of Corrections.

Williams said voter-passed initiatives will keep him from making enough cuts.

“But I don’t believe we can get to the $50 million target without bumping into some amount of those restrictions that are on the system,” he said.

Those restrictions come from voter-approved initiatives Measure 11, the state’s minimum sentencing law; Measure 57, which keeps repeat property offenders in jail longer; Article 1, Section 44 is a voter-passed law that requires a judge’s sentence to be carried out, and numerous federal mandates, including inmate health care.

Gov. Ted Kulongoski on Tuesday said the Legislature will have to use state reserve funds to keep Oregon’s prison system compliant with the law.

“The choices they have are too severe. They can’t release people,” he said.

Gaelen McAllister with Stand for Children said it’s a shame that state reserve money will go to prisons instead of classrooms.

“To say prisoners are protected and children aren’t, it’s just ridiculous,” she said. “Those things always sound good at the ballot box. Of course we want to lock up prisoners. Of course we want to have mandatory sentences, but people really don’t realize what the fiscal implications are.”

“I do think sometimes it’s easy to vote for something and not fully understand the financial context of it,” Williams said.

Education advocates said they are also concerned about the amount of money Oregon spends on prisons versus students. Per year the state spends three times more money housing an inmate than it does educating a student in the classroom.


FAMM To Testify About The Failure Of Mandatory Minimums May 26, 2010

Posted by FairSentencing in : Current News , add a comment

Julie Stewart, President and founder of FAMM, gives us this update:

Tomorrow at 4:15 p.m. EST, I will be testifying before the United States Sentencing Commission about the failure of mandatory minimums. Rather than make you wait for my report on the hearing, I invite you to join me by following FAMM on Twitter!  http://twitter.com/FAMMFoundation

At the hearing, Mary Price, FAMM’s vice president, will be tweeting live, as 17 experts provide testimony to help advise the Sentencing Commission as it writes its first report on federal mandatory minimum sentencing laws since 1991.

In my testimony, I will do what FAMM does best: tell the Commission the stories of FAMM members – stories about how mandatory minimum sentences are harming real people and real families – and call on the Commission to once again reject mandatory minimums.

Tomorrow’s  hearing will run from 8:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m.  The panel I’m on is scheduled to begin at 4:15 p.m.  Click here for the full agenda.

Please visit FAMM’s Twitter page, http://twitter.com/FAMMFoundation, follow along, and post your comments as I tell the Commission to tell Congress the truth: mandatory minimums are unjust and un-American!