jump to navigation

Prison Reform: A Smart Way For States To Save Money and Lives January 8, 2011

Posted by FairSentencing in : Current News , trackback

With nearly all 50 states facing budget deficits, it’s time to end business as usual in state capitols and for legislators to think and act with courage and creativity.

We urge conservative legislators to lead the way in addressing an issue often considered off-limits to reform: prisons. Several states have recently shown that they can save on costs without compromising public safety by intelligently reducing their prison populations.

We joined with other conservative leaders last month to announce the Right on Crime Campaign, a national movement urging states to make sensible and proven reforms to our criminal justice system – policies that will cut prison costs while keeping the public safe. Among the prominent signatories are Reagan administration attorney general Ed Meese, former drug czar Asa Hutchinson, David Keene of the American Conservative Union, John Dilulio of the University of Pennsylvania, Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform and Richard Viguerie of ConservativeHQ.com. We all agree that we can keep the public safe while spending fewer tax dollars if we spend them more effectively.

The Right on Crime Campaign represents a seismic shift in the legislative landscape. And it opens the way for a common-sense left-right agreement on an issue that has kept the parties apart for decades.

There is an urgent need to address the astronomical growth in the prison population, with its huge costs in dollars and lost human potential. We spent $68 billion in 2010 on corrections – 300 percent more than 25 years ago. The prison population is growing 13 times faster than the general population. These facts should trouble every American.

Our prisons might be worth the current cost if the recidivism rate were not so high, but, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, half of the prisoners released this year are expected to be back in prison within three years. If our prison policies are failing half of the time, and we know that there are more humane, effective alternatives, it is time to fundamentally rethink how we treat and rehabilitate our prisoners.

We can no longer afford business as usual with prisons. The criminal justice system is broken, and conservatives must lead the way in fixing it.

Several states have shown that it is possible to cut costs while keeping the public safe. Consider events in Texas, which is known to be tough on crime. Conservative Republicans joined with Democrats in adopting incentive-based funding to strengthen the state’s probation system in 2005. Then in 2007, they decided against building more prisons and instead opted to enhance proven community corrections approaches such as drug courts. The reforms are forecast to save $2 billion in prison costs over five years.

The Lone Star State has already redirected much of the money saved into community treatment for the mentally ill and low-level drug addicts. Not only have these reforms reduced Texas’s prison population – helping to close the state budget gap – but for the first time there is no waiting list for drug treatment in the state. And crime has dropped 10 percent from 2004, the year before the reforms, through 2009, according to the latest figures available, reaching its lowest annual rate since 1973.

Last year we both endorsed corrections reforms in South Carolina that will reserve costly prison beds for dangerous criminals while punishing low-risk offenders through lower-cost community supervision. The legislation was a bipartisan effort with strong support from liberals, conservatives, law enforcement, the judges and reform advocates. The state is expected to save $175 million in prison construction this year and $60 million in operating costs over the next several years.

Some people attribute the nation’s recent drop in crime to more people being locked up. But the facts show otherwise. While crime fell in nearly every state over the past seven years, some of those with the largest reductions in crime have also lowered their prison population. Compare Florida and New York. Over the past seven years, Florida’s incarceration rate has increased 16 percent, while New York’s decreased 16 percent. Yet the crime rate in New York has fallen twice as much as Florida’s. Put another way, although New York spent less on its prisons, it delivered better public safety.

Americans need to know that we can reform our prison systems to cost less and keep the public safe. We hope conservative leaders across the country will join with us in getting it right on crime.



1. Kaye Hanni - August 18, 2012

Safety and Justice for extreme minimum mandatory sentences of Oregon’s Measure 11

I am still stunned and reeling from the results of an extreme minimum mandatory sentence handed down to a family member in relation to the broad brush of measure 11 crimes.
While there is substance to the charges, the sentence does not fit the crime and has left an otherwise productive, mentally/ physically healthy, good contributing member of society, father of two facing a minimum mandatory prison sentence of 75 months or 7.5 years.
I still cannot believe how unreasonable and unjust this sentence is. Would not the state, the victim, the community be better served by the accused giving back rather than taking from society. The accused has been through much testing and found to not qualify for any prison programs because his likelihood to reoffend is non existent. I am outraged by the fact the (especially adult men) have no defense or creditability for their part of the story. I am appalled the “little girl” carries all the power without scrutiny, substantiated facts, etc. The flaws of human kind seems to feel more secure when there is an assigned enemy to pile on all societies ills (e.g. Salem witch hunts, McCarthy communism hysteria) without examining full disclosure/ facts from the accused. Really – how useful are these harsh sentences? Who wins, the victim, the accused, society? It is irrational to burden tax payers and an already overloaded criminal justice system for these harsh sentences. P.S. while allowing murders and confirmed sex perverts to serve much less time and return to terrorize society.